FAQ

How effective is minimally invasive surgery in treating ovarian cysts?

The results of minimally invasive surgery in the treatment of ovarian cysts are generally significant and effective. According to multiple studies and clinical data, laparoscopic and colposcopic removal, the two main minimally invasive surgical methods, perform well in the treatment of ovarian cysts.

treatment effect:

Laparoscopic surgery: This method has the advantages of less trauma, faster recovery, and fewer complications. Studies have shown that the therapeutic effectiveness of laparoscopic resection reaches 95.7%, which is significantly higher than the 84.6% of traditional laparotomy.
. In addition, laparoscopic surgery can improve ovarian function and stromal hemodynamics without seriously affecting ovarian volume and number of follicles, and avoids premature ovarian failure that may be caused by traditional laparotomy.
.
Colposcopy removal: This method has a short operation time, significant therapeutic effect, and the operation time is significantly shorter than traditional laparotomy (69.71 minutes vs. 80.91 minutes), but there is no statistically significant difference in surgical bleeding volume and hospitalization time between the two groups.
.
Postoperative recovery:

Minimally invasive surgeries typically require shorter hospital stays and faster post-operative recovery. For example, after laparoscopic surgery, the time to first exhaust gas and the time to leave the bed are significantly shortened, the amount of intraoperative bleeding is reduced, and postoperative complications are significantly reduced.
.
Perioperative nursing interventions further improved patients’ postoperative recovery and significantly reduced negative emotions and postoperative pain levels
.
Complications and Safety:

Minimally invasive surgery has less trauma and fewer postoperative complications, such as infection and bleeding.
. In addition, interventional ultrasound-guided treatment of patients with ovarian chocolate cysts has shown good results and low complication rates.
.
Preserve ovarian function:

Minimally invasive surgery is particularly suitable for patients who need to preserve their fertility. Through laparoscopic or transcolposcopy removal, normal ovarian tissue can be protected to the greatest extent and damage to the ovary and nearby normal tissues can be avoided.
.
In summary, minimally invasive surgery has shown high efficacy, rapid postoperative recovery, and low risk of complications in the treatment of ovarian cysts, and is a treatment method worthy of promotion and application.

What are the long-term efficacy and recurrence rates of minimally invasive surgery for the treatment of ovarian cysts?

The long-term efficacy and recurrence rate of minimally invasive surgery for the treatment of ovarian cysts can be analyzed from multiple perspectives.

According to research in the "Journal of the National Society of Clinical Medical Engineering", the application of laparoscopic and transcolposcopy removal in patients with ovarian cysts showed that the patient's ovarian cyst lesions were all cleared after examination, with no recurrence and no clinical symptoms. It disappears, and menstruation is basically normal in 3 months, that is, it is effective; the cyst lesions are basically cleared after inspection, and there is no recurrence, and the clinical symptoms basically disappear, and menstruation is basically normal after half a year, that is, it is effective.

. This shows that minimally invasive surgery has a high efficacy in treating ovarian cysts in the short term (such as 3-6 months), and there is no obvious recurrence.

However, it can be learned from "The Development and Application of Laparoscopic Technology" that neglecting and missing the tiny cysts or residual cyst wall lesions that existed before surgery is one of the main reasons for postoperative recurrence.

. Therefore, in order to reduce the postoperative recurrence rate, in addition to completely clearing the lesions, it is also necessary to use GnRHa (gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogues) postoperatively to control and reduce the recurrence rate.

. In addition, protecting ovarian function is also one of the important measures to reduce recurrence, especially to avoid or reduce the impact of electrical radiation on ovarian reserve function during surgery.
.

Based on the above information, the long-term efficacy of minimally invasive surgery for the treatment of ovarian cysts is usually good, but it needs to be combined with postoperative management (such as the combined use of drugs such as GnRHa) to further reduce the recurrence rate.

How does the cost-effectiveness of minimally invasive surgery compare with traditional open surgery for the treatment of ovarian cysts?

The cost-effectiveness comparison of minimally invasive surgery (eg, laparoscopic surgery) versus traditional open surgery for the treatment of ovarian cysts can be analyzed from multiple perspectives.

In terms of trauma and recovery time, laparotomy has a greater psychological and financial burden on patients due to its greater trauma and longer recovery time.

. In contrast, laparoscopic surgery has less trauma, shorter hospitalization time, and less impact on the body's immune function and stress response.
. This not only reduces patient hospitalization costs but also speeds up post-operative recovery, thereby lowering overall healthcare costs.
.

In terms of complication rate and nursing satisfaction, transvaginal laparoscopic treatment (NOTES) performs well in terms of safety, has a low risk of complications, and can reduce hospitalization costs.

. In addition, studies have shown that TV-LESS (transvaginal single-port laparoscopic surgery) has the advantages of less postoperative pain, faster recovery of defecation function, and higher cosmetic scores than other surgical methods.
.

However, it should be noted that although laparoscopic surgery is superior to open surgery in many aspects, its operation complexity is higher and it is not suitable for all situations, such as severe abdominal adhesions, tumors larger than 15cm in diameter, or suspected malignant tumors.
. Therefore, when choosing a specific surgical method, comprehensive consideration must be made based on the patient's specific condition and needs.

Overall, minimally invasive surgery is significantly more cost-effective than traditional open surgery in treating ovarian cysts. It not only reduces the patient's hospitalization time and medical expenses, but also improves postoperative recovery speed and quality of life, while reducing the incidence of complications.

What are the differences in the effects of minimally invasive surgery for different types of ovarian cysts (such as chocolate cysts, ovarian dysfunction, etc.)?

For different types of ovarian cysts (such as chocolate cysts, ovarian dysfunction, etc.), there are certain differences in the effects of minimally invasive surgery.

Chocolate cyst:

Interventional ultrasound-guided treatment: Interventional ultrasound-guided treatment for patients with ovarian chocolate cysts can not only achieve minimally invasive effects, but also have fewer postoperative complications, which can promote the patient’s speedy recovery and is worthy of promotion.
. In addition, this method has obvious advantages in terms of local efficacy, minimal invasion, few complications, and can be repeated many times. It is especially suitable for young patients with recurrent disease and infertility.
.
Laparoscopic surgery: Laparoscopic ovarian chocolate cyst removal is a common treatment method that relieves clinical symptoms through complete removal of cyst tissue. However, this surgery may affect the patient's ovarian reserve and increase their physical and mental burden
. Studies have shown that the combined use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists and laparoscopic surgery can significantly improve ovarian function, reduce the risk of postoperative complications, and improve patients’ quality of life.
.
Abnormal ovarian function:

For patients with ovarian dysfunction, laparoscopic surgery is also an effective minimally invasive treatment method. However, because ovarian dysfunction itself may affect recovery and outcomes after surgery, special attention is needed to postoperative care and monitoring. For example, in one study it was found that serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels were significantly decreased and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) levels were significantly increased in patients after laparoscopic surgery, suggesting that the surgery has a negative impact on the ovaries. The reserve function has a certain impact
.
Although minimally invasive surgery has achieved good results in treating both ovarian chocolate cysts and ovarian dysfunction, the specific results will vary depending on the patient's specific situation. Interventional ultrasound-guided treatment and laparoscopic surgery are both effective options for chocolate cysts, but individual patient differences and circumstances need to be considered when choosing a specific option.

How well does a patient's fertility recover after minimally invasive surgery?

Recovery of fertility in patients after minimally invasive surgery is usually ideal. According to multiple studies and clinical practice, patients who undergo minimally invasive procedures, such as laparoscopic conization and trachelectomy alone, do better in terms of conception rates, live birth rates, and preterm birth rates, as well as postoperative complications. less
.

Specifically, for cervical cancer patients, when choosing fertility-preserving surgery, factors such as tumor size and lymph node metastasis should be comprehensively considered, and combined with the experience of the treatment team and the patient's individualized treatment to achieve the best fertility results.
. In addition, in hysteroscopy combined with laparoscopic surgery, high-quality nursing intervention can significantly improve patients' nursing satisfaction and fertility recovery rate.
.

Hysteroscopic techniques have also shown good results when dealing with conditions such as endometrial polyps. Research shows that 86% of patients can repair their endometrium within 1 month after TCRP, and the remaining patients can also complete repair within 2 months.
. Therefore, women who want to have children should be guided to get pregnant as soon as possible to avoid the recurrence of polyps.

What is the complication rate with minimally invasive surgery for the treatment of ovarian cysts?

Complication rates with minimally invasive surgery for the treatment of ovarian cysts vary based on different studies and approaches. We can see the following data:

In a study on laparoscopic ovarian cyst removal, after perioperative care, the complication rate was 4.0% (3 cases) in the experimental group and 13.3% (10 cases) in the control group.
.
In another study, the postoperative complication rate using natural orifice laparoscopy (NOTES) technology was 3.90%, which was significantly lower than the 7.80% rate of conventional laparoscopic surgery.

For more photos and details please contact me:
Company Name: Tonglu Wanhe Medical Instruments Co., Ltd.
Sales: Sue